Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Honourable Brendan O'Connor v Zentai [2011] FCA 1162 Citation: Honourable Brendan O'Connor v Zentai [2011] FCA 1162
Appeal from: Zentai v Honourable Brendan O'Connor (No 4) [2010] FCA 1385
Parties: THE HONOURABLE BRENDAN O'CONNOR COMMONWEALTH MINISTER FOR HOME AFFAIRS, COMMONWEALTH ATTORNEY GENERAL and THE FORMER MINISTER FOR JUSTICE AND CUSTOMS, THE HONOURABLE CHRISTOPHER MARTIN ELLISON v CHARLES ZENTAI, BARBARA LANE and THE WESTERN AUSTRALIAN OFFICER IN CHARGE, HAKEA PRISON
File number: WAD 1 of 2011
Judge: JESSUP J
Date of judgment: 5 October 2011
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Judgment of full Court – Stay granted to facilitate application for special leave to appeal to High Court – Application for special Leave to Appeal duly made – Whether stay should be extended – Whether power should be exercised by single Judge.
Legislation: Extradition Act 1988 (Cth) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 25(2B)(ab)
Cases cited: Jennings Construction Limited v Burgundy Royale Investments Proprietary Limited (1986) 161 CLR 681
Date of hearing: 5 October 2011
Place: Melbourne
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 16
Counsel for the Appellants: Ms H Younan
Solicitor for the Appellants: Australian Government Solicitor
Counsel for the Respondents: Dr V Priskich
Solicitor for the Respondents: Fiocco's Lawyers
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION WAD 1 of 2011
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate