Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Sampson [2011] FCA 1165 Citation: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Sampson [2011] FCA 1165
Parties: AUSTRALIAN COMPETITION AND CONSUMER COMMISSION v PIPPA ROSALIND SAMPSON
File number: VID 852 of 2010
Judge: TRACEY J
Date of judgment: 17 October 2011
Legislation: Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) Schs 2, 7 Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) s 191 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 21 Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) (repealed) ss 52, 80, 83, 86C Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No 2) 2010 (Cth)
Cases cited: Ainsworth v Criminal Justice Commission (1992) 175 CLR 564 cited Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Allergy Pathway Pty Ltd [2009] FCA 960 cited Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Auspine Limited (2006) 235 ALR 95 compared Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Cosic Holdings Pty Ltd [2009] FCA 1579 cited Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Midland Brick Company Pty Ltd (2004) 207 ALR 329 cited Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v MSY Technology Pty Ltd (No 2) [2011] FCA 382 cited, considered Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Skins Compression Garments Pty Ltd [2009] FCA 710 cited Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Willesee Healthcare Pty Ltd (No 2) [2011] FCA 752 considered Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Wilson Parking 1992 Pty Ltd [2009] FCA 1580 cited BMI Limited v Federated Clerks Union of Australia (1983) 51 ALR 401 considered, distinguished Forster v Jododex Australia Pty Ltd (1972) 127 CLR 421 cited, considered ICI Australia Operations Pty Ltd v Trade Practices Commission (1992) 38 FCR 248 compared Medical Benefits Fund of Australia Ltd v Cassidy (2003) 135 FCR 1 applied Minister for Environment, Heritage and the Arts v PGP Developments Pty Ltd (2010) 183 FCR 10 cited Rural Press Limited v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (2003) 216 CLR 53 cited Russian Commercial and Industrial Bank v British Bank for Foreign Trade Limited [1921] 2 AC 438 cited
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate