Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Polar Aviation Pty Ltd v Civil Aviation Safety Authority (No 5) [2011] FCA 1187 Citation: Polar Aviation Pty Ltd v Civil Aviation Safety Authority (No 5) [2011] FCA 1187
Parties: POLAR AVIATION PTY LTD (ACN 007 986 834) and CLARK ANDREW BUTSON v CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY AUTHORITY, TERENCE FARQUHARSON, GARRY PRESNEILL, ROBERT COLLINS, JIM MARCOLIN, PETER JOHN and ALAN COOK
File number: VID 255 of 2010
Judge: KENNY J
Date of judgment: 20 October 2011
Catchwords: COSTS – where application dismissed under s 31A(2) of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) – in the absence of any special circumstances costs to follow the event – applicants to pay respondents' costs
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth)
Cases cited: Ruddock v Vadarlis (No 2) (2001) 115 FCR 229 Seven Network Ltd v News Ltd (2009) 182 FCR 160
Date of hearing: 31 January 2011
Date of last submissions: 7 October 2011
Place: Melbourne
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 5
Counsel for the Applicants: Mr G Nash QC with Ms E J Boros
Solicitor for the Applicants: Maitland Lawyers
Counsel for the Respondents: Mr S McLeish SC with Mr I Harvey
Solicitor for the Respondents: Australian Government Solicitor
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION VID 255 of 2010
BETWEEN: POLAR AVIATION PTY LTD (ACN 007 986 834)
First Applicant
CLARK ANDREW BUTSON
Second Applicant
AND: CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY AUTHORITY
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate