Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Guy Carpenter & Company Pty Ltd v Grove (No 2) [2011] FCA 1190 Citation: Guy Carpenter & Company Pty Ltd v Grove (No 2) [2011] FCA 1190
Parties: GUY CARPENTER & COMPANY PTY LTD ACN 000 351 299 v SCOTT GROVE, PETER CHEESMAN, JOHN CARROLL, GRANT HOLLYMAN and AON BENFIELD AUSTRALIA LIMITED ACN 003 026 668
File number(s): NSD 427 of 2011
Judge: JAGOT J
Date of judgment: 21 October 2011
Catchwords: DISCOVERY – where orders made for preliminary discovery – where applicant claimed respondents' discovery inadequate – whether applicant should be permitted to cross-examine respondents regarding compliance with discovery orders – whether "reasonable grounds for being fairly certain" that other relevant documents existed
Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth)
Cases cited: Guy Carpenter & Company Pty Ltd v Grove [2011] FCA 708 Procter v Kalivis [2009] FCA 1518
Date of hearing: 12 October 2011
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 11
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr A Moses SC with Mr J McLeod
Solicitor for the Applicant: Allens Arthur Robinson
Counsel for the First to Fourth Respondents: Mr M Elliott and Mr Woods
Solicitor for the First to Fourth Respondents: Harmers Workplace Lawyers
Counsel for the Fifth Respondent: Ms K Morgan
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate