Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Guy Carpenter & Company Pty Ltd v Grove (No 3) [2011] FCA 1250 Citation: Guy Carpenter & Company Pty Ltd v Grove (No 3) [2011] FCA 1250
Parties: GUY CARPENTER & COMPANY PTY LTD v SCOTT GROVE, JOHN CARROLL, GRANT HOLLYMAN, PETER CHEESEMAN and AON BENFIELD AUSTRALIA LTD ACN 003 026 668
File number(s): NSD 427 of 2011
Judge: JAGOT J
Date of judgment: 27 October 2011
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – discovery of documents – whether respondents should be required to serve further verified list of documents identifying nature of legal advice said to found claim for legal professional privilege
Legislation: Federal Court Rules 2011 Rule 20.17
Cases cited: Barnes v Commissioner of Taxation (2007) 242 ALR 601; [2007] FCAFC 88
Date of hearing: 27 October 2011
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 5
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr A Moses SC
Solicitor for the Applicant: Allans Arthur Robinson
Counsel for the First, Second, Third and Fourth Respondents: Mr M R Elliott
Solicitor for the First, Second, Third and Fourth Respondents: Harmers Workplace Lawyers
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate