Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Sacco trading as Globeline Automotive Service v F.V. Bilotto Nominess Pty Ltd [2011] FCA 1287 Citation: Sacco trading as Globeline Automotive Service v F.V. Bilotto Nominess Pty Ltd [2011] FCA 1287
Parties: DEANNE LOUISE SACCO (T/A GLOBELINE AUTOMOTIVE SERVICE) v F.V. BILOTTO NOMINEES PTY LTD
File number: VID 969 of 2011
Judge: DODDS-STREETON J
Date of judgment: 4 November 2011
Catchwords: COSTS – Applicant discontinued proceeding against respondent – Whether applicant should pay respondent's costs on an indemnity basis – Whether costs order should be made against applicant's solicitor – Whether respondent should pay applicant's costs of return date
Legislation: Federal Court Rules r 26.12
Cases cited: Colgate-Palmolive Co v Cussons Pty Ltd (1993) 46 FCR 225 cited Da Sousa & Anor v Minister of State for Immigration, Local Government and Ethnic Affairs (1993) 41 FCR 544 cited Ugly Tribe Co Pty Ltd v Sikola [2001] VSC 189 cited
Date of hearing: 4 November 2011
Date of publication of reasons: 10 November 2011
Date of last submissions: 4 November 2011
Place: Melbourne
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 11
Solicitor for the Applicant: Mr R D Silverstein of Ronald David Silverstein
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr J T Gottschall
Solicitor for the Respondent: Hentys Lawyers
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION VID 969 of 2011
BETWEEN: DEANNE LOUISE SACCO (T/A GLOBELINE AUTOMOTIVE SERVICE)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate