Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Napiat Pty Ltd v Salfinger; In the Matter of Salfinger (No 6) [2011] FCA 1298 Citation: Napiat Pty Ltd v Salfinger; In the Matter of Salfinger (No 6) [2011] FCA 1298
Parties: NAPIAT PTY LTD v RODERICK NEIL SALFINGER; IN THE MATTER OF RODERICK NEIL SALFINGER
File number: NSD 476 of 2011
Judge: FOSTER J
Date of judgment: 8 November 2011
Date of hearing: 8 November 2011
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: No Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 28
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr AP Cheshire
Solicitor for the Applicant: Gye Associates Lawyers
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr P Fary
Solicitor for the Respondent: Mr Barry B Moshel
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 476 of 2011
IN THE MATTER OF RODERICK NEIL SALFINGER BETWEEN: NAPIAT PTY LTD
Applicant
AND: RODERICK NEIL SALFINGER
Respondent
JUDGE: FOSTER J DATE OF ORDER: 8 NOVEMBER 2011 WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The whole of the affidavit affirmed by the respondent on 18 May 2011 and filed herein on 20 May 2011 and the whole of the affidavit affirmed by the respondent on 2 November 2011 (covering four pages and consisting of 26 paragraphs) and filed herein on 3 November 2011 be rejected. 2. All of the annexures and exhibits to the said affidavits be rejected except Exhibit "RNS#05" to the first of those affidavits which shall be admitted into evidence and marked as Exhibit "1". Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 476 of 2011
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate