Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Snook v Civil Aviation Safety Authority [2011] FCA 1300 Citation: Snook v Civil Aviation Safety Authority [2011] FCA 1300
Appeal from: Snook v Civil Aviation Safety Authority [2010] AATA 582
Parties: PETER JOHN SNOOK v CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY AUTHORITY
File number: VID 755 of 2010
Judge: TRACEY J
Date of judgment: 18 November 2011
Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – civil aviation - suspension and cancellation of licences and certificate – appeal on questions of law – whether irrelevant considerations taken into account or relevant considerations not taken into account – whether Tribunal failed to consider duties and responsibilities of licence- and certificate-holders under the Act with regard to irrelevant considerations – no reviewable error
Legislation: Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) ss 25, 31, 44 Civil Aviation Act 1988 (Cth) ss 3A, 8, 9, 98 Civil Aviation Regulations 1988 (Cth) reg 269 Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) s 39B
Cases cited: Australian Broadcasting Tribunal v Bond (1990) 170 CLR 321 referred to Australian Telecommunications Corporation v Lambroglou (1990) 12 AAR 515 applied Birdseye v Australian Securities and Investments Commission (2003) 38 AAR 55 cited Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko-Wallsend Pty Ltd (1986) 162 CLR 24 cited, applied TNT Skypack International (Aust) Pty Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1988) 19 ATR 1067 cited
Date of hearing: 10 December 2010
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate