Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Kumar v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2011] FCA 1332 Citation: Kumar v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2011] FCA 1332
Appeal from: Kumar v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2011] FMCA 660
Parties: KAMAL VENKATAIYA KUMAR v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & CITIZENSHIP and MIGRATION REVIEW TRIBUNAL
File number(s): NSD 1526 of 2011
Judge: YATES J
Date of judgment: 16 November 2011
Catchwords: MIGRATION – cancellation of visa – incorrect answers given in visa application
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 101, 107(1)
Date of hearing: 16 November 2011
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 35
Counsel for the Appellant: The Appellant appeared in person
Solicitor for the Respondents: Mr A Wood of Clayton Utz
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 1526 of 2011
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: KAMAL VENKATAIYA KUMAR
Appellant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & CITIZENSHIP
First Respondent
MIGRATION REVIEW TRIBUNAL
Second Respondent
JUDGE: YATES J DATE OF ORDER: 16 NOVEMBER 2011 WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The appeal be dismissed. 2. The appellant is to pay the first respondent's costs awarded as a lump sum in the amount of $2,620. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 1526 of 2011
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate