Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Smart Company Pty Ltd (In Liquidation) v Clipsal Australia Pty Ltd (No 7) [2011] FCA 1359 Citation: Smart Company Pty Ltd (In Liquidation) v Clipsal Australia Pty Ltd (No 7) [2011] FCA 1359
Parties: THE SMART COMPANY PTY LTD (IN LIQUIDATION) ACN 061 975 344 v CLIPSAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD ACN 007 873 529, CLIPSAL INTEGRATED SYSTEMS PTY LTD ACN 089 444 931 and CLIPSAL TECHNOLOGIES AUSTRALIA PTY LTD ACN 089 444 931
File number: WAD 132 of 2004
Judge: LANDER J
Date of judgment: 1 December 2011
Catchwords: COSTS – indemnity costs – lump sum assessment – quantifying assessment by reference to discrete periods
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 43, s 43(2), s 43(3)(g) Federal Court Rules 1979 O 23 r 11(6), O 62 r 4 Federal Court Rules 2011 r 1.04(3)
Cases cited: Beach Petroleum NL v Johnson (No 2) (1995) 57 FCR 119 cited Colgate Palmolive Co v Cussons Pty Ltd (1993) 46 FCR 225 cited Donald Campbell & Co Ltd v Pollak [1927] AC 732 cited Dunstan v Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission (No 3) [2006] FCA 916 cited Keen v Telstra Corporation Ltd (No 2) [2006] FCA 930 cited Latoudis v Casey (1990) 170 CLR 534 cited Preston v Preston [1981] 3 WLR 619 cited Ritter v Godfrey [1920] 2 KB 47 cited Smart Company Pty Ltd (In Liquidation) v Clipsal Australia Pty Ltd (No 6) [2011] FCA 419 related Su v Australian Fisheries Management Authority (No 3) [2008] FCA 2018 cited Trade Practices Commission v Nicholas Enterprises Pty Ltd (No 3) (1979) 42 FLR 213 cited
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate