Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Bank of Queensland Limited [2011] FCA 1361 Citation: Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Bank of Queensland Limited [2011] FCA 1361
Parties: AUSTRALIAN SECURITIES AND INVESTMENTS COMMISSION, BARRY DOYLE and DEANNA DOYLE v BANK OF QUEENSLAND LIMITED (ACN 009 656 740), SENRAC PTY LIMITED (ACN 107 625 981) and MACQUARIE BANK LIMITED (ACN 008 583 542)
File number: NSD 1797 of 2010
Judge: FOSTER J
Date of judgment: 30 November 2011
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – whether extensive claims made by ASIC pursuant to s 12GM of the Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001 (Cth) and s 50 of that Act should be struck out or summarily dismissed
Legislation: Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001 (Cth), ss 5(2), 12AA, 12BA, 12BAB, 12BC, 12CA, 12CB, 12CC, 12DA, 12ED, 12GJ, 12GM, 12HD, 50 Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), ss 79, 1041H, 1337BA Fair Trading Act 1989 (Qld), ss 5F, 39, 99, 100 Fair Trading Act 1999 (Vic), ss 7, 8, 8A, 158, 159 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), s 31A Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth), s 39B(1A)(c) Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth), ss 4B(1)(b)(ii), 51AA, 51AB, 51AC, 51AF, 52, 53, 73, 74, 75B, 77, 82, 86, 87 Federal Court Rules, O 11 r 16, O 20 r 5 Federal Court Rules 2011, r 1.04, r 16.21, r 26.01
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate