Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Modra v State of Victoria [2011] FCA 1375 Citation: Modra v State of Victoria [2011] FCA 1375
Parties: LUKE MODRA (BY HIS NEXT FRIEND ELLEN MODRA) v STATE OF VICTORIA (DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AND EARLY CHILDHOOD DEVELOPMENT AND DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES)
File number(s): VID 1312 of 2011
Judge: MARSHALL J
Date of judgment: 2 December 2011
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – interlocutory application - application for leave to appeal against parts of an interlocutory order of the Court – whether the order is attended with sufficient doubt to warrant reconsideration by a Full Court – application dismissed
Cases cited: Décor Corp v Dart Industries Inc (1991) 33 FCR 397 Lenijamar Pty Ltd v AGC (Advances) Ltd (1990) 27 FCR 388 Adam P Brown Male Fashions Pty Ltd v Philip Morris Inc (1981) 148 CLR 170 Ruddock v Vadarlis (No 2) (2001) 115 FCR 229
Date of hearing: 1 December 2011
Place: Melbourne
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 5
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr M Pearce SC
Solicitor for the Applicant: MLC Lawyers
Counsel for the Respondent: Ms R Doyle SC
Solicitor for the Respondent: Minter Ellison
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION VID 1312 of 2011
BETWEEN: LUKE MODRA (BY HIS NEXT FRIEND ELLEN MODRA)
Applicant
AND: STATE OF VICTORIA (DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AND EARLY CHILDHOOD DEVELOPMENT AND DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES)
Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate