Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
King on behalf of the Eringa Native Title Claim Group and the Eringa No 2 Native Title Claim Group v State of South Australia [2011] FCA 1387 Citation: King on behalf of the Eringa Native Title Claim Group and the Eringa No 2 Native Title Claim Group v State of South Australia [2011] FCA 1387
Parties: EDIE KING, RUTH MCKENZIE, EMILY CHURCHILL, HOWARD DOOLAN, DEAN AH CHEE AND MARILYN HULL ON BEHALF OF THE ERINGA NATIVE TITLE CLAIM GROUP AND THE ERINGA NO 2 NATIVE TITLE CLAIM GROUP v THE STATE OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA AND OTHERS LINDA CROMBIE, BRENDA SHIELDS, SHARON LUCAS, HAYDYN BROMLEY, ARTHUR AH CHEE ON BEHALF OF THE WANGKANGURRU/YARLUYANDI NATIVE TITLE CLAIM GROUP v THE STATE OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA AND OTHERS
File numbers: SAD 6010 of 1998 SAD 6016 of 1998 SAD 6002 of 1999
Judge: KEANE cJ
Date of judgment: 13 December 2011
Catchwords: NATIVE TITLE – consent determination – conditions prescribed by s 87A of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) satisfied – resolution by agreement of claims for determination of native title
Legislation: Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) Native Title Amendment Act 1998 (Cth)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate