Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Metcash Trading Limited v 8 Nai Investments Pty Limited; in the matter of 8 Nai Investments Pty Limited [2011] FCA 1400 Citation: Metcash Trading Limited v 8 Nai Investments Pty Limited; in the matter of 8 Nai Investments Pty Limited [2011] FCA 1400
Parties: METCASH TRADING LIMITED ACN 000 031 569 v 8 NAI INVESTMENTS PTY LIMITED ACN 151 402 470
File number(s): NSD 1892 of 2011
Judge: JACOBSON J
Date of judgment: 7 November 2011
Catchwords: CORPORATIONS – Application for extension of time to lodge notice of a charge
Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), s 266
Cases cited: Hewlett Packard Australia Pty Limited v Capital Finance Pty Limited (2003) 47 ACSR 589 National Australia Bank Ltd v Davis & Waddell (Vic) Pty Ltd (2003) 44 ASCR 296 Panadell Architectural Cladding Systems Pty Ltd v Panadell Industries Pty Ltd [2010] FCA 511 Seed Corporate Finance Pty Ltd v Savvytel Pty Ltd [2010] FCA 733
Date of hearing: 7 November 2011
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 14
Counsel for the Plaintiff: Mr S Golledge
Solicitor for the Plaintiff: Colin Biggers & Paisley Lawyers
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 1892 of 2011
IN THE MATTER OF 8 NAI INVESTMENTS PTY LIMITED ACN 151 402 470 BETWEEN: METCASH TRADING LIMITED ACN 000 031 569
Plaintiff
AND: 8 NAI INVESTMENTS PTY LIMITED ACN 151 402 470
Defendant
JUDGE: JACOBSON J DATE OF ORDER: 7 NOVEMBER 2011 WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate