Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Maxwell-Smith v Donnelly [2011] FCA 1412 Citation: Maxwell-Smith v Donnelly [2011] FCA 1412
Parties: EUGENE MAXWELL-SMITH and INGE MAXWELL-SMITH v MAX CHRISTOPHER DONNELLY and S & E HALL PTY LTD
File number: NSD 1904 of 2011
Judge: RARES J
Date of judgment: 21 November 2011
Legislation: Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) s 179
Cases cited: Maxwell-Smith v Donnelly (In the matter of Inge and Eugene Maxwell-Smith) [2007] FCA 894 cited Maxwell-Smith v Donnelly (No. 3) [2011] FCA 1226 cited Maxwell-Smith v Donnelly [2006] FCAFC 150 cited
Date of hearing: 21 November 2011
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: No catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 6
Counsel for the Applicants: The applicants did not appear
Counsel for the First Respondent: Mr BJ Skinner
Solicitor for the First Respondent: Church & Grace
Counsel for the Second Respondent: The second respondent did not appear
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 1904 of 2011
BETWEEN: EUGENE MAXWELL-SMITH
First Applicant
INGE MAXWELL-SMITH
Second Applicant
AND: MAX CHRISTOPHER DONNELLY
First Respondent
S & E HALL PTY LTD
Second Respondent
JUDGE: RARES J DATE OF ORDER: 21 NOVEMBER 2011 WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The notice of motion filed on 7 November 2011 be dismissed with costs. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate