Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Refund Property Fees Pty Ltd v Prime Project Development (Cairns) Pty Ltd (No 2) [2011] FCA 1414 Citation: Refund Property Fees Pty Ltd v Prime Project Development (Cairns) Pty Ltd (No 2) [2011] 1414
Parties: REFUND PROPERTY FEES PTY LTD ACN 145 709 360 v PRIME PROJECT DEVELOPMENT (CAIRNS) PTY LTD ACN 109 685 332, PROMOSEVEN PTY LTD ACN 102 606 324 and BLUECHIP DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (CAIRNS) PTY LTD ACN 117 021 566
File number: QUD 172 of 2011
Judge: LOGAN J
Date of judgment: 23 November 2011
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – summary judgment – security for costs – where summary judgment would prolong matter rather than facilitate its swift resolution – where worth of applicant such that security for costs not ordered – case not summarily dismissed – interlocutory applications dismissed
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 31A
Cases cited: Edwards v Santos Ltd (2011) 242 CLR 421 cited Wide Bay Conservation Council Inc v Burnett Water (No 2) Pty Ltd [2009] FCA 237 applied Queensland v Pioneer Concrete (Qld) Pty Ltd (1999) ATPR 41-691 referred to
Date of hearing: 23 November 2011
Place: Brisbane
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 12
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr R O'Hair
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate