Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Howard v Commissioner of Taxation (No 2) [2011] FCA 1421 Citation: Howard v Commissioner of Taxation (No 2) [2011] FCA 1421
Parties: STEPHEN JAMES HOWARD v COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION
File numbers: VID 80 of 2010 VID 28 of 2011
Judge: JESSUP J
Date of judgment: 14 December 2011
Catchwords: TAXATION – Income Tax – Taxpayer awarded equitable damages as compensation for losses sustained in joint venture where co-venturers acted in breach of fiduciary duties – Taxpayer a director of company proposed by him and some other joint venturers, also directors, to take benefit of business opportunity – Joint venture failed and opportunity lost as result of breach of fiduciary duties – Whether taxpayer held award of damages on trust for company – Given that award had character of income, whether included in assessable income of taxpayer. TAXATION – Income tax – Distributions by non-resident trust estate – Whether included in assessable income of resident discretionary beneficiary – Net income of trust estate – whether included proceeds of shares sold back to company – Whether difference made by interposition of bare sub-trust – Taxpayer beneficiary's share of net income of trust estate – How calculated when all beneficiaries discretionary interest – whether all beneficiaries contingently entitled to whole of corpus of trust estate. TAXATION – Income tax – Administrative penalty for omission to return as income distribution received from non-resident trust estate – Counsel's advice obtained when full facts not known – Supplementary advice not sought – whether taxpayer's conduct intentional, reckless or involved failure to take reasonable care.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate