Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Mercedes Holdings Pty Ltd v Waters (No 5) [2011] FCA 1428 Citation: Mercedes Holdings Pty Ltd v Waters (No 5) [2011] FCA 1428
Parties: MERCEDES HOLDINGS PTY LIMITED, MAX INVESTMENTS (AUST) PTY LIMITED, MANSTED ENTERPRISES PTY LTD, MICHELLE O'GARR, JM CUSTOMS & FREIGHT SERVICES PTY LIMITED, OSVON PTY LIMITED, ADAM JOHN THORN & GRAHAM DEAN and MARK ROBERT HODGES & JANET ANNE HODGES v ANDREA JANE WATERS, MICHAEL JOHN ANDREW, WELLINGTON INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT LIMITED, OCTAVIA LIMITED, GUY HUTCHINGS, JOHN ARTHUR WHATELEY, JACK SIMON DIAMOND, CRAIG ROBERT WHITE, DEBORAH BEALE, STEVEN KRIS KYLING, STUART ROBERTSON PRICE, MICHAEL GORDON HISCOCK, MICHAEL CHRISTODOULOU KING, PAUL JOSEPH MANKA and IAN ZELINSKI
File number: NSD 324 of 2009
Judge: PERRAM J
Date of judgment: 14 December 2011
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Pleadings – statement of claim – application to amend – whether pleading discloses reasonable cause of action – whether leave to amend prohibited by prior orders of the Court – application for summary dismissal – former pleading not defended – whether costs orders appropriate
Legislation: Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) ss 82, 229 Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) s 4AA Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) ss 9, 208, 210, 601FD, 601HG, 1285, 1311, 1325 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 31A Trusts Act 1973 (Qld) s 21 Federal Court Rules 1979 O 62, rr 3, 29
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate