Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Zhao v Goodman [2011] FCA 1438 Citation: Zhao v Goodman [2011] FCA 1438
Appeal from: Zhao v Goodman [2011] FMCA 518; Goodman v Zhao [2011] FMCA 578
Parties: YAN SHOU ZHAO v MARLA SHOSHANA GOODMAN
File number(s): NSD 1070 of 2011 NSD 1332 of 2011
Judge: NICHOLAS J
Date of judgment: 25 November 2011
Cases cited: Henderson v Henderson (1843) 3 Hare 100; (1843) 67 ER 313 Fox v Percy (2003) 214 CLR 118 Port of Melbourne Authority and Anshun Pty Ltd (1981) 147 CLR 589 Zhao v Goodman & Anor [2010] NSWCA 2
Date of hearing: 25 November 2011
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: No Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 20
Counsel for the Appellant: The Appellant appeared in person
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr S Ahmed
Solicitor for the Respondent: Mills Oakley Lawyers
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 1070 of 2011
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: YAN SHOU ZHAO
Appellant
AND: MARLA SHOSHANA GOODMAN
Respondent
JUDGE: NICHOLAS J DATE OF ORDER: 25 NOVEMBER 2011 WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The appeal be dismissed. 2. The appellant pay the respondent's costs of the appeal. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 1332 of 2011
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate