Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Rafferty v Time 2000 West Pty Ltd (No 8) [2011] FCA 1444 Citation: Rafferty v Time 2000 West Pty Ltd (No 8) [2011] FCA 1444
Parties: PATRICK CAMPBELL RAFFERTY, SANTORA HOLDINGS PTY LIMITED ACN 128 467 550 and KARAVILLE HOLDINGS PTY LIMITED ACN 009 439 178 v TIME 2000 WEST PTY LIMITED ACN 127 893 270, TIME 2000 SYSTEMS (AUSTRALIA) PTY LIMITED ACN 127 853 614, TIME 2000 OPERATIONS (AUSTRALIA) PTY LIMITED ACN 128 700 541, EMBLETON LIMITED (A COMPANY INCORPORATED IN HONG KONG), STEPHEN GERARD DONOVAN and MADGWICKS
File number: SAD 122 of 2008
Judge: LANDER J
Date of judgment: 7 November 2011
Date of hearing: 7 November 2011
Place: Adelaide
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: No catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 14
Counsel for the Applicants: Mr A Rosser
Solicitor for the Applicants: Cosoff Cudmore Knox
Counsel for the Gemhall Holdings Pty Ltd: Mr A Lazarevich
Solicitor for the Gemhall Holdings Pty Ltd: Pace Lawyers
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION SAD 122 of 2008
BETWEEN: PATRICK CAMPBELL RAFFERTY
First Applicant
SANTORA HOLDINGS PTY LIMITED ACN 128 467 550
Second Applicant
KARAVILLE HOLDINGS PTY LIMITED ACN 009 439 178
Third Applicant
AND: TIME 2000 WEST PTY LIMITED ACN 127 893 270
First Respondent
TIME 2000 SYSTEMS (AUSTRALIA) PTY LIMITED
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate