Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Iluka Resources Limited v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2011] FCA 1447 Citation: Iluka Resources Limited v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2011] FCA 1447
Parties: ILUKA RESOURCES LIMITED (ACN 008 675 018) v CONSTRUCTION, FORESTRY, MINING AND ENERGY UNION and GARY WOOD
File number: WAD 466 of 2011
Judge: SIOPIS J
Date of judgment: 23 November 2011
Catchwords: INDUSTRIAL LAW – application for interlocutory injunction having final effect – whether the applicant demonstrated a strong prospect of success that respondents had contravened s 345 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) – balance of convenience – whether the applicant would suffer irreparable damage if interlocutory injunction not granted.
Legislation: Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) ss 228, 345, 545
Date of hearing: 23 November 2011
Date of Publication 14 December 2011 of Reasons:
Place: Perth
Division: FAIR WORK DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 34
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr IM Neil SC
Solicitor for the Applicant: Clayton Utz
Counsel for the First and Second Respondents: Mr P Laskaris
Solicitor for the First and Second Respondents: WG McNally Jones Staff
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY FAIR WORK DIVISION WAD 466 of 2011
BETWEEN: ILUKA RESOURCES LIMITED (ACN 008 675 018)
Applicant
AND: CONSTRUCTION, FORESTRY, MINING AND ENERGY UNION
First Respondent
GARY WOOD
Second Respondent
JUDGE: SIOPIS J DATE OF ORDER: 23 NOVEMBER 2011 WHERE MADE: PERTH
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate