Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Metz Holdings Pty Ltd v Simmac Pty Ltd (No 3) [2011] FCA 1450 Citation: Metz Holdings Pty Ltd v Simmac Pty Ltd (No 3) [2011] FCA 1450
Parties: METZ HOLDINGS PTY LTD (ACN 059 264 210) AS TRUSTEE FOR THE ZULU TRUST AND GROUP M PTY LTD (ACN 118 506 148) AS TRUSTEE FOR THE ROUBAIX TRUST, MERVIN METZ and FARREL METZ v SIMMAC PTY LTD (ACN 062 327 397), PAUL CAMPBELL SIM, LINDA MCBRIERTY and LINDA MCBRIERTY AND EDWARD HUGH JENNINGS AS TRUSTEES FOR THE LINDA MCBRIERTY SUPERANNUATION FUND
File number: WAD 114 of 2009
Judge: BARKER J
Date of judgment: 15 December 2011
Catchwords: COSTS - offer of compromise - application for indemnity costs pursuant to O 23 r 11(4) of the Federal Court Rules - whether the Court should 'otherwise order' - indemnity costs ordered
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 43 Federal Court Rules 1979 (Cth) O 23 r 11(4)
Cases cited: Fountain Selected Meats (Sales) Pty Ltd v International Produce Merchants Pty Ltd and others (1988) FCA 202; (1988) 81 ALR 397 Futuretronics.com.au Pty Ltd v Graphix Labels Pty Ltd [2009] FCAFC 40 Metz Holdings Pty Ltd v Simmac Pty Ltd (No 2) [2011] FCA 981 Stambulich & Ors v Ekamper [2001] WASCA 283 Sunlec International Ltd v Carroll Australasia Pty Ltd [2001] WASC 354 Timms v Clift [1998] 2 Qd R 100
Date of hearing: 31 August 2011
Place: Perth
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate