Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Gaffney v RSM Bird Cameron Partners (A Firm) [2011] FCA 1453 Citation: Gaffney v RSM Bird Cameron Partners (A Firm) [2011] FCA 1453
Parties: ANGELA GAFFNEY v RSM BIRD CAMERON PARTNERS (A FIRM) and BIRDANCO NOMINEES PTY LTD (AS TRUSTEE FOR THE BIRDANCO PRACTICE TRUST) (ACN 009 321 377)
File number: WAD 281 of 2010
Judge: GILMOUR J
Date of judgment: 6 December 2011
Date of hearing: 6 December 2011
Place: Perth
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: No catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 6
Counsel for the Applicant: Ms F O'Brien (SC) with Ms L Kirwen
Solicitor for the Applicant: Ilberys
Counsel for the Respondents: Mr M Goldblatt
Solicitor for the Respondents: Hammond King Touyz
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION WAD 281 of 2010
BETWEEN: ANGELA GAFFNEY
Applicant
AND: RSM BIRD CAMERON PARTNERS (A FIRM)
First Respondent
BIRDANCO NOMINEES PTY LTD (AS TRUSTEE FOR THE BIRDANCO PRACTICE TRUST) (ACN 009 321 377)
Second Respondent
JUDGE: GILMOUR J DATE OF ORDER: 6 DECEMBER 2011 WHERE MADE: PERTH
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The first and second respondents have leave to file a notice of cross-claim in respect only of claim B in the statement of claim annexed to the affidavit of Mr Colin Touyz, sworn 25 August 2011. 2. The costs of that be in the cause. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION WAD 281 of 2010
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate