Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Food Improvers Pty Ltd v BGR Corporation Pty Ltd (in Liq) (No 10) [2011] FCA 1476 Citation: Food Improvers Pty Ltd v BGR Corporation Pty Ltd (in Liq) (No 10) [2011] FCA 1476
Parties: THE FOOD IMPROVERS PTY LIMITED ACN 003 474 280 and JOHN STEPHEN BAX v BGR CORPORATION PTY LIMITED ACN 059 820 807 (IN LIQUIDATION) , THE TRIAD HEALTH PRODUCTS GROUP OF COMPANIES PTY LTD ACN 002 688 897, CORDATO PARTNERS (SERVICES) PTY LIMITED ACN 075 518 964, MAIN CAMP HOLDINGS PTY LIMITED ACN 061 573 804, MAIN CAMP CORPORATION PTY LIMITED ACN 054 989 516, SNP NATURAL PRODUCTS PTY LIMITED ACN 094 464 490, ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH PTY LIMITED ACN 088 655 163 and BUSINESS & RESEARCH MANAGEMENT LIMITED ACN 070 946 664
File number: NSD 1140 of 2005
Judge: RARES J
Date of judgment: 23 November 2011
Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) ss 477(2B), 488(1), 488(2), 556(1), 1322(4) Corporations Regulations 2001 (Cth) reg 5.6.71
Cases cited: Birch v Cropper; In Re Bridgewater Navigation Company Limited (1889) 14 App Cas 525 applied Brealey v Shields [2009] NSWSC 1148 followed Donne v Lewis (1805) 11 Ves Jun 601 referred to Emanuele v Australian Securities Commission (1997) 188 CLR 114 applied The Food Improvers Pty Ltd v BGR Corporation Pty Ltd (No 3) [2007] FCA 97 cited
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate