Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Ortiz v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2011] FCA 1498 Citation: Ortiz v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2011] FCA 1498
Appeal from: Ortiz v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2011] FMCA 432
Parties: SANTIAGO ORTIZ v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP and MIGRATION REVIEW TRIBUNAL
File number: QUD 160 of 2011
Judge: LOGAN J
Date of judgment: 22 December 2011
Catchwords: MIGRATION – judicial review – procedural fairness – statutory obligation to provide fair and just hearing – whether failure to adjourn Tribunal proceedings to await outcome of Family Court proceedings constituted a denial of procedural fairness – where Family Court proceeding intimately connected to Tribunal proceeding – where no evidence that appellant not prosecuting Family Court proceeding with due diligence – Tribunal decision was unreasonable MIGRATION – unreasonableness – whether Tribunal conducted a proper review – where Tribunal suggested that appellant undergo a DNA test to prove paternity of child in question – where appellant could not take such a test unless he had access to the child – whether suggestion, which formed part of basis of Tribunal's decision was unreasonable – where Tribunal had clear information showing that appellant is father of child – where Tribunal misconstrued that evidence – Tribunal's decision was unreasonable – Tribunal failed to exercise jurisdiction
Legislation: Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) ss 61C, 69Q Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 348, 353, 357A, 359 Births, Deaths and Marriages Registration Act 2003 (Qld) ss 11, 49 Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) Sch 2 cl 820.221 United Nations Covenant on Civil Political Rights (16 December 1966) 999 UNTS 171 Art 17
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate