Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
MG Corrosion Consultants Pty Ltd v Gilmour [2011] FCA 1514 Citation: MG Corrosion Consultants Pty Ltd v Gilmour [2011] FCA 1514
Parties: MG CORROSION CONSULTANTS PTY LTD ACN 084 715 177 v MALCOLM STEWARD GILMOUR and MAGIL NOMINEES PTY LTD ACN 009 059 607
File number: WAD 256 of 2010
Judge: BARKER J
Date of judgment: 23 December 2011
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – discovery – derivative proceedings – redaction
Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) s 286 Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 37M, s 37N, s 50 Federal Court Rules 1979 (Cth) O 5 r 2 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) R 20.14, R 20.17, R 20.18, R 20.21, R 20.32
Cases cited: Hogan v Australian Crime Commission [2010] HCA 21; (2010) 240 CLR 651 MG Corrosion Consultants Pty Ltd v Vinciguerra [2011] FCAFC 31; (2011) 82 ACSR 367 Mobil Oil Australia Ltd & Anor v Guina Developments Pty Ltd & Anor [1996] 2 VR 34 Sunland Waterfront (BVI) Ltd v Prudentia Investments Pty Ltd (No 4) [2010] FCA 863 Vinciguerra v MG Corrosion Consultants Pty Ltd [2010] FCA 763
Date of hearing: 9 December 2011
Place: Perth
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 96
Counsel for the Plaintiff: Mr CS Williams
Solicitor for the Plaintiff: Solomon Brothers
Counsel for the Defendants: Mr P Poliwka
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate