Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Sinclair v Highgrove (Richmond) Pty Ltd [2011] FCA 1534 Citation: Sinclair v Highgrove (Richmond) Pty Ltd [2011] FCA 1534
Parties: LINDSAY JOHN SINCLAIR and HIGHGROVE TRADING PTY LTD ACN 109 019 981 v HIGHGROVE (RICHMOND) PTY LTD ACN 123 956 374, STUART RICHARD BEVAN, ST YORK PTY LTD ACN 146 408 022 and STUBEVAN PTY LTD ACN 123 955 868
File number: QUD 499 of 2011
Judge: LOGAN J
Date of judgment: 7 December 2011
Catchwords: CORPORATIONS – winding up – appointment of liquidators – whether to appoint Queensland and Victoria based liquidators – where interests in company equally split between the Gold Coast and Melbourne – one Victorian and one Queensland based liquidator appointed
Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) s 477
Date of hearing: 7 December 2011
Place: Brisbane
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 14
Counsel for the Applicants: Mr CD Coulsen
Solicitor for the Applicants: Hall Lawyers
Counsel for the Respondents: Mr D Chesterman
Solicitor for the Respondents: Scoglio Law as town agents for Wisewould Mahony Lawyers
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION QUD 499 of 2011
BETWEEN: LINDSAY JOHN SINCLAIR
First Applicant
HIGHGROVE TRADING PTY LTD ACN 109 019 981
Second Applicant
AND: HIGHGROVE (RICHMOND) PTY LTD ACN 123 956 374
First Respondent
STUART RICHARD BEVAN
Second Respondent
ST YORK PTY LTD ACN 146 408 022
Third Respondent
STUBEVAN PTY LTD ACN 123 955 868
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate