Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v Pilbara Iron Company (Services) Pty Ltd [2011] FCA 1541 Citation: Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v Pilbara Iron Company (Services) Pty Ltd [2011] FCA 1541
Parties: CONSTRUCTION, FORESTRY, MINING AND ENERGY UNION and DARYL LAMBERTH v PILBARA IRON COMPANY (SERVICES) PTY LTD (ACN 107 210 248)
File number(s): NSD 1928 of 2011
Judge: KATZMANN J
Date of judgment: 24 November 2011
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for transfer of proceedings – change of venue – whether satisfied that there is sound reason for the proceeding to be transferred elsewhere – relevant considerations
Legislation: Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 48(1)
Cases cited: Austal Ships Pty Ltd v Stena Rederi Aktiebolag [2004] FCA 302 Mortimer v Opes Prime Stockbroking Ltd (in liq) [2009] FCA 227 National Mutual Holdings Pty Ltd v The Sentry Corporation (1988) 19 FCR 155
Date of hearing: 24 November 2011
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 18
Counsel for the Applicants: Mr R Reitano
Solicitor for the Applicants: Slater & Gordon
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr J Fernon SC
Solicitor for the Respondent: Freehills
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 1928 of 2011
BETWEEN: CONSTRUCTION, FORESTRY, MINING AND ENERGY UNION
First Applicant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate