Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Kowalski v Dolphin [2011] FCA 502 Citation: Kowalski v Dolphin [2011] FCA 502
Parties: KAZIMIR KOWALSKI v STEVEN PETER DOLPHIN, LIESCHKE & WEATHERILL, CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS and QBE INSURANCE (AUSTRALIA) LIMITED
File number: SAD 12 of 2011
Judge: MANSFIELD J
Date of judgment: 20 May 2011
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application pursuant to O 21 r 5 seeking leave to continue proceedings after being declared a vexatious litigant – application refused
Legislation: Legal Practitioners Act 1981 (SA) Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) Fair Trading Act 1987 (SA) Misrepresentation Act 1972 (SA) Workers Compensation and Rehabilitation Act 1986 (SA) Criminal Law Consolidation Act 1935 (SA) Federal Court Rules
Cases cited: Soden v Kowalski [2011] FCA 318 cited Mitsubishi Motors Australia Ltd v Kowalski [2005] SASC 309 cited Horvath v Commonwealth Bank of Australia [1999] FCA 504 considered
Date of Hearing: Heard on the papers
Date of last submissions: 29 April 2011
Place: Brisbane (via video link to Adelaide)
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 15
Counsel for the Applicant: The applicant appeared in person
Solicitor for the Respondents: The respondents did not appear
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION SAD 12 of 2011
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate