Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
King v Jetstar Airways Pty Ltd (No 2) [2012] FCA 8 Citation: King v Jetstar Airways Pty Ltd (No 2) [2012] FCA 8
Parties: SHEILA KING v JETSTAR AIRWAYS PTY LTD
File number(s): NSD 1171 of 2009
Judge: ROBERTSON J
Date of judgment: 13 January 2012
Catchwords: HUMAN RIGHTS – Discrimination – direct disability discrimination – identification of service – refusal of service – whether provision of service would impose unjustifiable hardship HUMAN RIGHTS – Discrimination – alternative claim of indirect disability discrimination – whether imposition of requirement or condition – whether any condition or requirement 'not reasonable'
Legislation: Australian Human Rights Commission Act 1986 (Cth) s 46PO Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (Cth) ss 3, 4, 5, 6, 7. 11, 12, 24
Cases cited: AB v Western Australia (2011) 281 ALR 694 applied Australian Medical Council v Wilson (1996) 68 FCR 46 applied Catholic Education Office v Clarke (2004) 138 FCR 121 applied Commonwealth v Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission (1995) 63 FCR 74 applied Cooper v Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission (1999) 93 FCR 481 referred to Dye v Commonwealth Securities Limited (No 2) [2010] FCAFC 118 applied Hills Grammar School v Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission (2000) 100 FCR 306 followed IW v City of Perth (1997) 191 CLR 1 distinguished Purvis v New South Wales (2003) 217 CLR 92 applied Scott v Telstra Corporation (1995) EOC 92-717 referred to State of New South Wales v Amery (2006) 230 CLR 174 followed Walker v Victoria (Department of Education and Early Childhood Development) (2011) 279 ALR 284 cited Waters v Public Transport Corporation (1991) 173 CLR 349 followed
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate