Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Henderson v Corporation of the City of Adelaide (No 2) [2012] FCA 9 Citation: Henderson v Corporation of the City of Adelaide (No 2) [2012] FCA 9
Parties: PATRINA KELLY HENDERSON v CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF ADELAIDE
File number: SAD 131 of 2011
Judge: BESANKO J
Date of judgment: 13 January 2012
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for summary judgment under s 31A(2) of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1975 (Cth) – alternative application for striking out statement of claim or for particulars - where applicant claimed to be 'interested person' for purposes of s 475(1) and (6) of Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Cth) – where responsible Minister listed threatened ecological community in endangered category under the Act – where respondent entered into construction agreements for redevelopment of Victoria Park - where applicant alleged respondent's conduct constitutes contravention of s 18(6)(a) or 18(6)(b) of the Act and sought relief to prevent further conduct – where applicant claims conduct of respondent will 'significantly impact' listed ecological community – whether applicant has reasonable prospect of successfully prosecuting the proceeding where no evidence is provided to contradict expert evidence provided by respondent that relevant area does not meet requirements for protection under Act – whether pleadings are inadequate where relief claimed merely repeats a statutory prohibition – whether pleadings are embarrassing, frivolous or vexatious and liable to be struck out where no link between alleged contravention of Act and relief sought provided. Held: The respondent is entitled to an order for summary judgment.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate