Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Castel Electronics Pty Ltd v TCL Air Conditioner (Zhongshan) Co Ltd [2012] FCA 21 Citation: Castel Electronics Pty Ltd v TCL Air Conditioner (Zhongshan) Co Ltd [2012] FCA 21
Parties: CASTEL ELECTRONICS PTY LTD ACN 074 561 087 v TCL AIR CONDITIONER (ZHONGSHAN) CO LTD
File number(s): VID 218 of 2011 VID 224 of 2011 VID 317 of 2011
Judge: MURPHY J
Date of judgment: 23 January 2012
Catchwords: ARBITRATION – International Arbitration - Jurisdiction of Federal Court to enforce non-foreign Model Law awards under the International Arbitration Act 1974 (Cth) – Effect of s 39B(1A)(c) of the Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) – Meaning of "matter" and "arising under" STATUTORY INTERPRETATION – Principles on retrospectivity
Legislation: Commercial Arbitration Act 2011 (Vic) Commercial Arbitration Act 1984 (Vic) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) International Arbitration Act 1974 (Cth) Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth)
Cases cited: Agtrack (NT) Pty Ltd v Hatfield (2005) 223 CLR 251 Felton v Mulligan (1971) 124 CLR 367 Fencott v Muller (1983) 152 CLR 570 Hooper v Kirella (1999 96 FCR 1 Maxwell v Murphy (1957) 96 CLR 261 Minister for Home and Territories v Smith (1924) 35 CLR 120 National Union of Workers v Davids Distribution Pty Ltd (1999) 91 FCR 513 Re Wakim; Ex parte McNally (1999) 198 CLR 511 Stack v Coast Securities (No 9) Pty Ltd (1983) 154 CLR 261 Transport Workers Union of Australia v Lee (1998) 84 FCR 60 Trustees Executors and Agency Co Ltd v Gleeson (1959) 102 CLR 334
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate