Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
CA, Inc. v ISI Pty Limited [2012] FCA 35 Citation: CA, Inc. v ISI Pty Limited [2012] FCA 35
Parties: CA, INC. and CA (PACIFIC) PTY LIMITED ACN 001 146 345 v ISI PTY LIMITED ACN 003 152 225
File number: NSD 242 of 2010
Judge: BENNETT J
Date of judgment: 3 February 2012
Catchwords: COPYRIGHT – subsistence – whether applicants' database management system identified with sufficient precision to be classified as a "computer program" and/or a "literary work" under the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth) – applicants' database management system product contains macros – whether applicants' macros are a "computer program" and/or a "literary work" under the Copyright Act COPYRIGHT – infringement – respondent develops product to enable users of applicants' database management system to convert to another database management system – respondent's product includes macros to replace applicants' macros – whether respondent's macros reproduce substantial part of applicants' database management system – whether respondent's macros reproduce substantial part of applicants' macros – relevance of functionality COPYRIGHT – defences – whether defence in s 47D(1) of the Copyright Act available to respondent – whether respondent acting "on behalf of" applicants' licensees for purposes of s 47D(1) CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION – respondent develops product to enable users of applicants' database management system to convert to another database management system – applicants allege respondent's product developed using applicants' confidential information – whether allegedly confidential information identified with sufficient specificity CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION – whether information has quality of confidence – whether certain alleged disclosures of information destroy quality of confidence CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION – respondent develops product while working as independent contractor at premises of licensees of applicants' database management system – whether applicants' information imparted to respondent in circumstances importing duty of confidence – whether respondent bound by equitable obligation of confidence CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION – whether unauthorised use of allegedly confidential information EQUITY – laches – alleged delay by applicants in commencing proceedings – whether inequitable for applicants to gain relief for breach of confidential information TRADE PRACTICES – whether alleged representations contravene ss 52 and 53 of Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate