Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Dunkerley v Administrative Appeals Tribunal [2012] FCA 41 Citation: Dunkerley v Administrative Appeals Tribunal [2012] FCA 41
Parties: ULLA-MAIJA DUNKERLEY v ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL and COMCARE
File number: ACD 44 of 2010
Judge: PERRAM J
Date of judgment: 3 February 2012
Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – Appeal – appeal from Administrative Appeals Tribunal – whether Tribunal failed to consider relevant considerations – whether Tribunal misconstrued departmental policy statement
Legislation: Safety, Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 1988 (Cth) s 5A Public Service Act 1999 (Cth)
Cases cited: Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Wang (2003) 215 CLR 518 cited Renard Constructions (ME) Pty Ltd v Minister for Public Works (1992) 26 NSWLR 234 cited Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko-Wallsend Ltd (1986) 162 CLR 24 cited
Date of hearing: 27 June 2011
Place: Canberra
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 39
Counsel for the Applicant: The applicant appeared in person
Counsel for the Second Respondent: Mr B Dubé
Solicitor for the Second Respondent: Dibbs Barker
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION ACD 44 of 2010
BETWEEN: ULLA-MAIJA DUNKERLEY
Applicant
AND: ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate