Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Cicciarelli v Qantas Airways Ltd [2012] FCA 56 Citation: Cicciarelli v Qantas Airways Ltd [2012] FCA 56
Parties: LUIGI CICCIARELLI and MICHAEL INGUANTI v QANTAS AIRWAYS LTD (ACN 009 661 901)
File number: VID 398 of 2009
Judge: KENNY J
Date of judgment: 7 February 2012
Catchwords: INDUSTRIAL LAW – termination of employment of first and second applicants – alleged breaches of s 792 of the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth) – applicants delegates of industrial organisation – whether applicants' employment was terminated for a prohibited reason – whether respondent discharged the reverse onus imposed by s 809 – respondent provided an explanation of reasons for termination of applicants' employment and extensive evidence of investigation prior to dismissals – respondent alleged that applicants organised and incited industrial action or attempted to do so – applicants denied those allegations – respondent undertook investigation process – found that first applicant had organised and incited industrial action – found that second applicant had attempted to organise and incite industrial action – applicants challenged investigation process – held that the investigation process was sufficient and it was open to decision maker to make relevant findings on material – delegates dismissed for misconduct – held: onus under s 809 discharged CONTRACTS – whether breach of employment contract – applicants summarily – respondent claimed that relevant contracts of employment contained processes for dealing with alleged misconduct – open to respondent to dismiss employee on summary basis where those procedures followed – whether respondent's policies and procedures followed – applicants challenged investigation process – no contractual right to protection from harsh, unjust or unreasonable termination – applicants engaged in conduct warranting summary dismissal – held: no breach of contract by the respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate