Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Hamden v Campbell [2012] FCA 65 Citation: Hamden v Campbell [2012] FCA 65
Parties: DAVID HAMDEN v KATHRYN CAMPBELL, SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES
File number: SAD 255 of 2011
Judge: LANDER J
Date of judgment: 3 February 2012
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – discovery – application for particular discovery – application dismissed
Legislation: Archives Act 1983 (Cth), s 24 Federal Court Rules 2011, r 20.14, r 20.15, r 20.21
Date of hearing: 3 February 2012
Place: Adelaide
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 11
Counsel for the Applicant: The Applicant appeared in person
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr P d'Assumpcao
Solicitor for the Respondent: Australian Government Solicitor
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION SAD 255 of 2011
BETWEEN: DAVID HAMDEN
Applicant
AND: KATHRYN CAMPBELL, SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES
Respondent
JUDGE: LANDER J DATE OF ORDER: 3 FEBRUARY 2012 WHERE MADE: ADELAIDE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The applicant's application for particular discovery be dismissed. 2. The applicant pay the respondent's costs of the interlocutory application. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION SAD 255 of 2011
BETWEEN: DAVID HAMDEN
Applicant
AND: KATHRYN CAMPBELL, SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate