Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Websyte Corporation Pty Ltd v Alexander [2012] FCA 69 Citation: Websyte Corporation Pty Ltd v Alexander [2012] FCA 69
Parties: WEBSYTE CORPORATION PTY LTD (ACN 097 870 936) v LACHLAN ALEXANDER and SHANE MCGRATH
File number: VID 207 of 2011
Judge: JESSUP J
Date of judgment: 13 February 2012
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Search order – Undertakings not to use recovered items for other purpose – Whether applicant to be released from undertakings – Whether documents might be provided to police in connection with corresponding criminal investigation.
Legislation: Copyright Act 1968 (Cth) s 132AJ Crimes Act 1958 (Vic) s 247G
Cases cited: Bailey v Australian Broadcasting Corporation [1995] 1 Qd R 476 Liberty Funding Pty Ltd v Phoenix Capital Ltd (2005) 218 ALR 283
Date of hearing: 1 February 2012
Place: Melbourne
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 26
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr I Horak
Solicitor for the Applicant: Holding Redlich
Counsel for the First Respondent: The first respondent did not appear
Counsel for the Second Respondent: Mr J Wheelahan
Solicitor for the Second Respondent: Bullards Lawyers
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION VID 207 of 2011
BETWEEN: WEBSYTE CORPORATION PTY LTD (ACN 097 870 936)
Applicant
AND: LACHLAN ALEXANDER
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate