Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Farley-Smith v Repatriation Commission [2012] FCA 80 Citation: Farley-Smith v Repatriation Commission [2012] FCA 80
Appeal from: Farley-Smith and Repatriation Commission [2010] AATA 637
Parties: GWENDA FARLEY-SMITH v REPATRIATION COMMISSION
File number: VID 826 of 2010
Judge: DODDS-STREETON J
Date of judgment: 13 February 2012
Catchwords: DEFENCE AND WAR – Claim for pension by widow of veteran with operational service – Administrative Appeals Tribunal affirmed decision of respondent that death of veteran not war-caused – Standard of proof – Whether tribunal misapplied relevant principles and authorities – Whether apprehended bias – Whether denial of procedural fairness
Legislation: Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) ss 33, 39 Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (Cth) s 120(1) and (3)
Cases cited: British American Tobacco Australia Services Ltd v Laurie (2011) 242 CLR 283 distinguished Bull v Repatriation Commission (2001) 188 ALR 756 cited Bushell v Repatriation Commission (1992) 175 CLR 408 considered Byrnes v Repatriation Commission (1993) 177 CLR 564 considered Collins v Repatriation Commission (2009) 177 FCR 280 cited East v Repatriation Commission (1987) 16 FCR 517 discussed Leighton v Repatriation Commission [2000] AATA 144 considered Leon Holdings Pty Ltd v O'Donnell (2009) 25 VR 569 Re Stacey (unreported, Veterans' Review Board, 26 June 1985) cited Repatriation Commission v Bey (1997) 79 FCR 364 discussed Repatriation Commission v Dunn (2006) 94 ALD 97 cited Repatriation Commission v Law (1980) 31 ALR 140 cited Repatriation Commission v Webb (1998) 51 ALD 575 discussed The Ship "Gem of Safaga" v Euroceanica (UK) Ltd (2010) 265 ALR 88 cited Whitworth v Repatriation Commission (2003) 78 ALD 126 discussed
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate