Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Dunn v Repatriation Commission [2012] FCA 87 Citation: Dunn v Repatriation Commission [2012] FCA 87
Appeal from: Application for extension of time: Dunn v Repatriation Commission [2011] AATA 893
Parties: DAWN ELEANOR DUNN v REPATRIATION COMMISSION
File number: WAD 8 of 2012
Judge: GILMOUR J
Date of judgment: 7 February 2012
Legislation: Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth), s 442A Federal Court Rules (2011) (Cth) r 33.13
Date of hearing: 7 February 2012
Place: Perth
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: No catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 5
Counsel for the Applicant: Simon Dunn on behalf of his mother Dawn Eleanor Dunn
Counsel for the Respondent: Teresa Ling
Solicitor for the Respondent: Australian Government Solicitor
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION WAD 8 of 2012
BETWEEN: DAWN ELEANOR DUNN
Applicant
AND: REPATRIATION COMMISSION
Respondent
JUDGE: GILMOUR J DATE OF ORDER: 7 FEBRUARY 2012 WHERE MADE: PERTH
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The time in which the applicant may institute an appeal under s 44(2A) of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) be extended to and including 28 February 2012. 2. The costs of the application be costs in any appeal instituted by the applicant. NOTE: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION WAD 8 of 2012
BETWEEN: DAWN ELEANOR DUNN
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate