Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Bitek Pty Ltd v IConnect Pty Ltd [2012] FCA 133 Citation: Bitek Pty Ltd v IConnect Pty Ltd [2012] FCA 133
Parties: BITEK PTY LTD ACN 084 308 207 v ICONNECT PTY LTD ACN 129 382 341 and ABEDEL-GUNE CHAKIELLI
File number: VID 1249 of 2011
Judge: KENNY J
Date of judgment: 24 February 2012
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – default judgment – respondent had not entered an appearance or filed a defence – respondent in default – judgment given.
Legislation: Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) Designs Act 2003 (Cth)
Cases cited: Yeo v Damos Earthmoving Pty Ltd [2011] FCA 1129 Arthur v Vaupotic Investments Pty Ltd [2005] FCA 433 Diesel SPA v Hwang [2005] FCA 1619 Wu v Avin Operations Pty Ltd [2006] FCA 36 HIT Entertainment Ltd v Lodin [2006] FCA 722 Macquarie Bank Ltd v Seagle [2005] 46 FCR 400 Macquarie Bank Ltd v Seagle [2008] FCA 1417 Speedo Holdings BV v Evans (No 2) [2011] FCA 1227 Universal City Studios LLLP v Hoey t/as DVD Kingdom (2006) 232 ALR 525 Norwich Pharmacal Co v Commissioners of Customs & Excise [1974] AC 133 Computershare Ltd v Perpetual Registrars Ltd [2000] 1 VR 626 Hooper v Kirella Pty Ltd (1999) 96 FCR 1
Date of hearing: 24 February 2012
Place: Melbourne
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 27
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr Gary Fitzgerald
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate