Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SingTel Optus Pty Limited v Australian Football League [2012] FCA 138 Citation: SingTel Optus Pty Limited v Australian Football League [2012] FCA 138
Parties: SINGTEL OPTUS PTY LIMITED (ACN 052 833 208) v AUSTRALIAN FOOTBALL LEAGUE (ACN 004 155 211)
File number: NSD 267 of 2012
Judge: EDMONDS J
Date of judgment: 28 February 2012
Catchwords: AUSTRALIAN CONSUMER LAW – whether statements concerning activities of corporation deceptive or misleading against backdrop of judgment of the Court – whether conduct in trade or commerce Held: no contravention of s 18 of Schedule 2 Australian Consumer Law.
Legislation: Copyright Act 1968 (Cth) Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth)
Cases cited: SingTel Optus Pty Ltd v National Rugby League Investments Pty Ltd (No 2) [2012] FCA 34 referred to Concrete Constructions (NSW) Pty Limited v Nelson (1990) 169 CLR 594 applied Village Building Company Ltd v Canberra International Airport Pty Ltd (2004) 139 FCR 330 (affirmed (2004) 208 ALR 98) cited Robin Pty Ltd v Canberra International Airport Pty Ltd (1999) 179 ALR 449 cited Global Sportsman Pty Ltd v Mirror Newspapers Pty Ltd (1984) 2 FCR 82 applied Campbell v Backoffice Investments Pty Ltd (2009) 238 CLR 304 cited
Date of hearing: 23 February 2012
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 22
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate