Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Apotex Pty Ltd v AstraZeneca AB (No 2) [2012] FCA 142 Citation: Apotex Pty Ltd v AstraZeneca AB (No 2) [2012] FCA 142
Parties: APOTEX PTY LTD v ASTRAZENECA AB and ASTRAZENECA PTY LTD
File number: NSD 673 of 2011
Judge: EMMETT J
Date of judgment: 28 February 2012
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 37M Patents Act 1990 (Cth) s 40(3)
Cases cited: Apotex Pty Ltd v AstraZeneca AB [2011] FCA 1520
Date of hearing: 31 January and 6 February 2012
Date of orders: 6 February 2012
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: No catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 46
Counsel for the applicant: DK Catterns QC, KJ Howard SC, HPT Bevan
Solicitor for the applicant: Freehills
Counsel for the respondents: AJ Bannon SC, C Dimitriadis, D Kell
Solicitor for the respondents: Blake Dawson
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 673 of 2011
BETWEEN: APOTEX PTY LTD
Applicant
AND: ASTRAZENECA AB
First Respondent
ASTRAZENECA PTY LTD
Second Respondent
JUDGE: EMMETT J DATE OF ORDER: 6 February 2012 WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The applicant's motion be adjourned to 10.15am on Thursday, 1 March 2012. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 673 of 2011
BETWEEN: APOTEX PTY LTD
Applicant
AND: ASTRAZENECA AB
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate