Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Crisp, in the matter of ACN 069 895 585 Pty Ltd (in liq) v ACN 069 859 585 Pty Ltd (in liq) [2012] FCA 148 Citation: Crisp, in the matter of ACN 069 895 585 Pty Ltd (in liq) v ACN 069 859 585 Pty Ltd (in liq) [2012] FCA 148
Parties: GLENN ANTHONY CRISP AS LIQUIDATOR OF ACN 069 895 585 PTY LTD (IN LIQUIDATION) v ACN 069 859 585 PTY LTD (IN LIQUIDATION) and INSURANCE AUSTRALIA LIMITED (ACN 000 016 722)
File number: VID 633 of 2010
Judge: JESSUP J
Date of judgment: 5 March 2012
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Discovery – Privilege – Whether claim of privilege waived by making of claims in proceeding – Whether maintenance of privilege inconsistent with those claims – Whether contents of documents necessarily laid open for scrutiny by those claims.
Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) s 473
Cases cited: BHP Billiton Petroleum (Bass Strait) Pty Ltd v Esso Australia Resources Pty Ltd [2007] VSCA 224 Commissioner of Taxation v Rio Tinto Ltd (2006) 151 FCR 341 Mann v Carnell (1999) 201 CLR 1
Date of hearing: 2 February 2012
Place: Melbourne
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 18
Counsel for the Plaintiff: Mr R Kendall QC
Solicitor for the Plaintiff: Rothwell Lawyers
Counsel for the First Defendant: The first defendant did not appear
Counsel for the Second Defendant: Mr S Habib SC with Ms R Francois
Solicitor for the Second Defendant: William Roberts Lawyers
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate