Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Li v Wu [2012] FCA 164 Citation: Li v Wu [2012] FCA 164
Parties: YU XIN LI v TAO WU
File number(s): ACD 54 of 2011
Judge: JAGOT J
Date of judgment: 2 March 2012
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application by respondent to restrain applicant's solicitor from acting as the applicant's legal representative – where respondent was former client of solicitor – whether confidential information relating to respondent communicated to solicitor – whether restraint necessary to ensure the administration of justice – application dismissed
Cases cited: Carindale Country Club Estate Pty Ltd v Astill (1993) 42 FCR 307; [1993] FCA 218 Geelong School Supplies Pty Ltd v Dean (2006) 237 ALR 612; [2006] FCA 1404 Ismail-Zai v State of Western Australia (2007) 34 WAR 379; [2007] WASCA 150 Kallinicos v Hunt (2005) 64 NSWLR 561; [2005] NSWSC 1181 Yunghanns v Elfic Ltd (formerly known as Elders Finance & Investment Co Ltd) (unreported, Supreme Court of Victoria, Gillard J, 3 July 1998)
Date of hearing: 22 February 2012
Place: Sydney via video link to Canberra
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 25
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr I Neil SC and Mr B Katekar
Solicitor for the Applicant: Goodman Law
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr S Hausfield
Solicitor for the Respondent: Johannessen Legal & Migration
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION ACD 54 of 2011
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate