Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Vatarescu v Commonwealth of Australia for the Agency of Centrelink (No 2) [2012] FCA 165 Citation: Vatarescu v Commonwealth of Australia for the Agency of Centrelink (No 2) [2012] FCA 165
Appeal from: Vatarescu v Commonwealth of Australia for the Agency of Centrelink (No 2) [2011] FMCA 376
Parties: ANDREI VATARESCU v COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA FOR THE AGENCY OF CENTRELINK
File number: ACD 25 of 2011
Judge: JAGOT J
Date of judgment: 2 March 2012
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – whether leave to appeal should be granted – leave to appeal refused
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) Federal Magistrates Act 1999 (Cth) Social Security Act 1991 (Cth)
Cases cited: Kowalski v MMAL Staff Superannuation Fund Pty Ltd (2009) 259 ALR 319; [2009] FCAFC 117 Vatarescu v Commonwealth of Australia [2009] FMCA 1041 Vatarescu v Commonwealth of Australia for the Agency of Centrelink [2009] FCA 1539 Vatarescu v Commonwealth of Australia for the Agency of Centrelink (No 2) [2011] FMCA 376
Date of hearing: 21 February 2012
Place: Sydney via video link to Canberra
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 26
Counsel for the Appellant: The appellant appeared in person
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr D O'Donovan
Solicitor for the Respondent: Australian Government Solicitor
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION ACD 25 of 2011
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate