Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Clement v Comcare [2012] FCA 166 Citation: Clement v Comcare [2012] FCA 166
Appeal from: Clement and Comcare [2010] AATA 296
Parties: KRISTINE CLEMENT v COMCARE
File number(s): ACD 18 of 2010
Judge: JAGOT J
Date of judgment: 2 March 2012
Catchwords: APPEAL AND NEW TRIAL – appeal from decision of Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT) – whether questions of law arise - whether any breach of procedural fairness – appeal dismissed
Legislation: Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth) Census and Statistics Act 1905 (Cth) Mental Health (Treatment and Care) Act 1994 (ACT) Safety, Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 1988 (Cth)
Cases cited: Clement v Comcare [2007] FCA 2039 Clement v Comcare [2008] FCA 1779 Clement v Comcare [2008] FCA 1780 Clement v Comcare [2010] AATA 296 Collector of Customs (NSW) v Brian Lawlor Automotive Pty Ltd (1979) 2 ALD 1 Telstra Corporation Limited v Hannaford (2006) 151 FCR 253; [2006] FCAFC 87
Date of hearing: 20 February 2012
Place: Sydney via video link to Canberra
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 30
Counsel for the Applicant: The applicant appeared in person
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr B Dube
ON APPEAL FROM THE ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION ACD 18 of 2010
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate