Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Bob Jane Corporation Pty Ltd v Webtyre.net Pty Ltd [2012] FCA 168 Citation: Bob Jane Corporation Pty Ltd v Webtyre.net Pty Ltd [2012] FCA 168
Related to: Bob Jane Corporation Pty Ltd v Bob Jane Global Tyres Corporation (Australia) Pty Ltd (No 2) [2011] FCA 1363
Parties: BOB JANE CORPORATION PTY LTD (ACN 005 870 431) v WEBTYRE.NET PTY LTD (ACN 149 801 141), WEBTYRE.NET VICTORIA PTY LTD (ACN 149 001 383), CALDER PARK PROMOTIONS PTY LTD (ACN 138 012 021), ROBERT FREDERICK JANE and BOB JANE GLOBAL TYRE CORPORATION (HONG KONG) LIMITED
File number: VID 418 of 2011
Judge: NORTH J
Date of judgment: 2 February 2012
Date of hearing: 2 February 2012
Place: Melbourne
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: No Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 30
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr A K Panna SC
Solicitor for the Applicant: Hall & Wilcox Lawyers
Counsel for the Respondents: Mr A J Ryan SC with Mr A D Nash
Solicitor for the Respondents: Clayton Utz
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION VID 418 of 2011
BETWEEN: BOB JANE CORPORATION PTY LTD (ACN 005 870 431)
Applicant / Cross Respondent
AND: WEBTYRE.NET PTY LTD (ACN 149 801 141)
First Respondent
WEBTYRE.NET VICTORIA PTY LTD (ACN 149 001 383)
Second Respondent / Second Cross Claimant
CALDER PARK PROMOTIONS PTY LTD (ACN 138 012 021)
Third Respondent
ROBERT FREDERICK JANE
Fourth Respondent / First Cross Claimant
DENNIS PETER RIGON
Fifth Respondent
BOB JANE GLOBAL TYRE CORPORATION (HONG KONG) LIMITED
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate