Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Crosse v Negus [2012] FCA 182 Citation: Crosse v Negus [2012] FCA 182
Parties: TYRONE CROSSE v TONY NEGUS (SUED IN HIS CAPACITY AS THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE) and COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA
File number: VID 1431 of 2011
Judge: NORTH J
Date of judgment: 27 January 2012
Date of hearing: 27 January 2012
Place: Melbourne
Division: FAIR WORK DIVISION
Category: No Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 6
Solicitor for the Applicant: Mr K Farouque of Maurice Blackburn Lawyers
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr G Livermore
Solicitor for the Respondent: Australian Government Solicitor
Solicitor for the Respondent: Mr D Poulton of Minter Ellison
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY FAIR WORK DIVISION VID 1431 of 2011
BETWEEN: TYRONE CROSSE
Applicant
AND: TONY NEGUS (SUED IN HIS CAPACITY AS THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE)
First Respondent
COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA
Second Respondent
JUDGE: NORTH J DATE OF ORDER: 27 JANUARY 2012 WHERE MADE: MELBOURNE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. Until further order, no person shall publicly disclose the contents of: 1.1. the seventeenth and eighteenth words of paragraph 13 of the Statement of Claim in this proceeding dated 12 December 2011 (Statement of Claim); 1.2. the twenty-seventh to twenty-ninth words inclusive of the particulars appended to paragraph 13 of the Statement of Claim; 1.3. the twenty-ninth to thirty-second words inclusive of the first paragraph of particulars appended to paragraph 15 of the second paragraph of the Statement of Claim; 1.4. the second paragraph of the particulars appended to paragraph 15 of the Statement of Claim; and 1.5. the eighth, and twenty-seventh to thirty-first words inclusive of the third paragraph of particulars appended to paragraph 15 of the second paragraph of the Statement of Claim; all of which have been redacted in the copy of the Statement of Claim annexed to this order (the Redacted Statement of Claim). 2. Until further order, only the Redacted Statement of Claim be publicly searchable on the file of the Court and a copy of this Order be attached to the Redacted Statement of Claim which is placed on the Court's file. 3. Each of the original unredacted Statement of Claim and the confidential affidavit of Shane Patrick Connelly sworn on 26 January 2012 be placed on the Court's file each in a sealed envelope marked "Confidential - Not to be disclosed without an order of the Docket Judge". 4. A copy of this order is to be served on: 4.1. The applicant, through his solicitors, Maurice Blackman Lawyers. 4.2. The Age Company Pty Ltd, Fairfax Media Limited and Mischa Merz by email transmission to their Solicitors, Minter Ellison, at David.Poulton@minterellison.com. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate