Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Sheikholeslami v Tolcher (No 2) [2012] FCA 199 Citation: Sheikholeslami v Tolcher (No 2) [2012] FCA 199
Parties: GITA SHEIKHOLESLAMI v RAYMOND TOLCHER AS TRUSTEE OF THE BANKRUPT ESTATE OF ROYA SHEIKHOLESLAMI
File number(s): NSD 1164 of 2010
Judge: YATES J
Date of judgment: 9 March 2012
Catchwords: COSTS – apportionment
Legislation: Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) s 32 Federal Court Rules 2011 r 40.05
Cases cited: Citibank Limited v Parker (2000) 181 ALR 115 Ex parte Angerstein (1874) LR 9 Ch App 479 Sandor v Ramirez [1999] NSWCA 261 Sheikholeslami v Tolcher [2011] FCA 1050
Date of hearing: 11 November 2011
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 25
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr M Condon
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr S Golledge
Solicitor for the Respondent: Turnbull Hill Lawyers
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 1164 of 2010
BETWEEN: GITA SHEIKHOLESLAMI
Applicant
AND: RAYMOND TOLCHER AS TRUSTEE OF THE BANKRUPT ESTATE OF ROYA SHEIKHOLESLAMI
Respondent
JUDGE: YATES J DATE OF ORDER: 9 MARCH 2012 WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The respondent pay 50% of the applicant's costs as taxed or agreed. 2. In the event of a taxation, the costs of the proceeding in the Supreme Court of New South Wales be taxed in accordance with Division 40.2 of the Federal Court Rules 2011. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate