Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Visscher v Teekay Shipping (Australia) Pty Limited (No 3) [2012] FCA 212 Citation: Visscher v Teekay Shipping (Australia) Pty Limited (No 3) [2012] FCA 212
Parties: TIMOTHY VISSCHER v TEEKAY SHIPPING (AUSTRALIA) PTY LTD
File number(s): NSD 308 of 2007
Judge: KATZMANN J
Date of judgment: 13 March 2012
Catchwords: COSTS – Application for indemnity costs – litigant in person – extent of costs recoverable
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) ss 31A, 43 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 40.01, 40.02 Navigation Act 1912 (Cth)
Cases cited: Cachia v Hanes (1994) 179 CLR 403 Cachia v The Hills Shire Council [2010] NSWLEC 136 Ex parte Farmers Fertilizers Corp Ltd (1916) 16 SR (NSW) 645 George v Fletcher (Trustee)(No 2) [2010] FCAFC 71 Kuhl v Zurich Financial Services Australia Ltd (2011) 243 CLR 361 Visscher v Teekay Shipping (Australia) Pty Ltd [2011] FCAFC 137
Date of hearing: 15 December 2011
Date of last submissions: 27 January 2012
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 12
Counsel for the Applicant: The applicant appeared in person.
Solicitor for the Respondent: Ms N Martin of Norton Rose
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 308 of 2007
BETWEEN: TIMOTHY VISSCHER
Applicant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate